The Bill of Rights was Disappointed and Ashamed!!! MUST READ...

Now, you're crying "sorry" that's what your evil plans are. He said that Senator Risa violated RA 4200 or commonly as Anti-Wired Law. What is the law? Section 1 of RA 4200 states,

Section 1. It shall be unlawful for any person, not being authorized by all the parties to any private communication or spoken word, to tap any wire or cable, or by using any other device or arrangement, to secretly overhear, intercept, or record such communication or spoken word by using a device commonly known as a dictaphone or dictagraph or dictaphone or walkie-talkie or tape recorder, or however otherwise described:

It shall also be unlawful for any person, be he a participant or not in the act or acts penalized in the next preceding sentence, to knowingly possess any tape record, wire record, disc record, or any other such record, or copies thereof, of any communication or spoken word secured either before or after the effective date of this Act in the manner prohibited by this law; or to replay the same for any other person or persons; or to communicate the contents thereof, either verbally or in writing, or to furnish transcriptions thereof, whether complete or partial, to any other person: Provided, That the use of such record or any copies thereof as evidence in any civil, criminal investigation or trial of offenses mentioned in section 3 hereof, shall not be covered by this prohibition.

Do not include photos and screenshots So, Senator Ping Lacson has a pending bill to expand the law to prohibit taking screen shots or still pictures of communications, which only means, as of today's bill, the screenshots and still pictures are not the so-called wiretapping.

Besides, Sir, are not you lawyers? Why do not you know the parliamentary immunity? It's a privilege speech to a senator on the floor. Covered by parliamentary immunity. That means you can not get it, duh? Basic principle, do not you know?

Many Supreme Court cases about this and those who make the Constitution intend to have a parliamentary immunity for free to vote and legislators can proclaim during deliberations and privilege speech on the floor.

And you're Wiguirre, you said naviolate your privacy, Luh using 40 font size on cellphone, do you think you have privacy? And then you're in hearing, your phone is in plain view with 40 font size, is there privacy? Shungaers lang? And what you're proud of is right now, that's not all right now, because you're no longer in the budget. Are you only given the budget for CHR for your budget? So you suffer. Lawyer lawyer still does not know the parliamentary immunity?